Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home

Ghillie Suits and Gear

Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Survival Tips : The Survivalist Blog
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Defense fund for Bloomberg suits | Main | Feinstein puts "hold" on BATFE reform bill »

Newark abandons crackdown on real offenders

Posted by David Hardy · 29 September 2006 09:09 AM

A Newark, NJ program to crack down on firearm crime by actually cracking down on repeat and violent offenders has been scrapped, over the objections of police.

Apparently the assignments judge didn't like it. The primary reason for scrapping was that the only verifiable result was higher bails. Well, as with the BATFE effort discussed below, you really can't implement a local program, wait a year or two, and expect someone to produce objective statistical evidence that it affected crime. Crime rates go up and down for reasons we can only partially explain (classic case: murder trends tend to mirror trends in accidental motor deaths -- but why?). You can't just say rates went up or down after you did something, and that proves what you did worked or didn't work. At the local level, where numbers are smaller, there can be quite a bit of random variation.

I find it rather strange that efforts to enforce gun laws against serious offenders are subjected to a standard of "produce objective proof that this actually reduced crime," whereas enactment of additional regulations is tested by something more like "sounds like a nice idea."

Hat tip to Joe Olson.

Comments