Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home

Ghillie Suits and Gear

Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Survival Tips : The Survivalist Blog
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Arizona | Main | Article on Va Tech and fighting back »

Brady Center on study of microstamping

Posted by David Hardy · 11 May 2007 04:49 PM

I blogged the study here. Brady Center just came out with a press release critiquing the critque.

It "utilized vintage firearms that had never been considered for testing previously because of their model age (10-50+ years) and mechanical condition" The guns used were S&W .40 calibers -- hardly a cap and ball!

"NanoMark Technologies, which holds the patent for microstamping technology, provided firing pins for the study, but they were not optimized due to Beddow's budget constraints." Hmm? No details on what this optimization would have been, or why it would have affected wear on the firing pin. That it was so expensive as to prevent the manufacturer from undertaking it does not bode well for the argument that the expense of microstamping would be reasonable.

The whole debate omits the simple point that a commenter made in the earlier post. A crime-fighting technology that a criminal can negate with a few swipes of a file is not a very good one.

Comments

I graduated much higher than 6th grade, but I still don't know what "optimized" means in the context of the story.

Posted by: Letalis at May 11, 2007 06:11 PM

utilized vintage firearms that had never been considered for testing previously because of their model age (10-50+ years)

They're joking, right?

Please, tell me they're kidding. They can't possibly be that stupid.

They honestly think 10-50 years is enough time for a firearm model to be 'vintage'? What do they think the m1911 is?!

Posted by: gattsuru at May 11, 2007 09:36 PM

Does this mean that all 10-50 year old firearm designs would be exempt from their stupid little micro-stamp?


;)


Hurray for the 1911!

Posted by: KRL at May 12, 2007 08:34 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)